Coffee!! Dinosaurs were blondes or redheads? Who cares?

Not content with inflicting evolutionary psychology on us, the tax-funded tenured darwinists in their ivory towers are making up new stories for themselves. This time they're pretending to know what color dinosaurs were. First they're saying that a Sinosauropteryx - discovered in communist China - was coveniently red. Hmmm, think about it! They "know" this because red looks different under a magnifying glass than other colors, which is ridiculous because colors don't have shapes, but I guess common sense is why I'm not a professor of dinosaurs.

And now they've even made an animation of another one, as if they'd sent a cameraman back in time. Does anyone else find it just a little too convenient that this other dinosaur they're selling to the public is called Anchiornis huxleyi, after Saint Darwin's biggest number 1 buddy and inventor of eugenics, Huxley? Well color me unimpressed; it's just a critter with feathers, like lots of other critters. It's a dinosaur - claws and teeth and a bony tail - so how they use that as "evidence for evolution" is beyond me. These are the same people who claim that Archaeoptryx (clearly a bird, with feathered wings) is a "transitional fossil"!!

Look, I don't know what color a tyrannosaur was, and I don't know why the trilobite died out and I don't care about those things because we don't know, never really will and it's not going to alter the price of bread one way or another. Okay, so we can see what color an animal is now; that's science. Pretending to know what color an animal was which has been dead for ages isn't science. The last time I saw a dead animal it was a raccoon which had been hit by a car and was all decayed and smelly, not beautiful at all and the last thing I wanted to do was stick around to describe what color its nose was.