Bottom-feeding flatfish consume tax dollars

Flatfish have always been a problem for darwinists because nobody's ever seen a symmetrical fish squash itself flat. Instead they come up with just-so stories of a symmetrical fish squashing itself flat in small incremental steps over millions of years, but nobody's ever seen that either.

Charles Darwin grappled unsuccessfully with the problem. Darwin was troubled by how fish such as flounder and sole had made the seemingly improbable evolutionary leap from being symmetrical to having two eyes on the same side of their face.

According to the Times of London someone thinks he's found the "missing link" of flatfish evolution so Saint Darwin was right. Tax money well spent; looking for squashed old fish instead of finding a cure for cancer.
When will scientists accept that in reality these are not "transitional fossils" at all? They don't have one leg or half a wing like a proper transition should but instead are fully formed and perfectly complete fish. Neither regular upright fish nor flatfish but perfectly complete and designed leaning-over-in-between fish.